Hi Aahan, I always love reading your thoughts although must admit skipping to the summary which is most helpful if I'm short on time. One thing that always strikes me is a little bit of confusion regarding strategy's (I know you've introduced new ones) and there expected risk/return.
For example the ETF portfolio summary usually states:
"We aim to achieve strong risk-adjusted returns relative to cash, with limited capital drawdowns in depth and duration"
Which is in contrast to article above:
"ETF Portfolio: Beta + Alpha. Aims to outperform a balanced mix of stocks, bonds, commodities, and gold. Weekly signals."
Unless the ETF Beta + Alpha is different to the "ETF Portfolio"?
Wanted to flag it as I'm guessing others might be struggling with this as well. An explicite risk/return profile would be helpful.
Hi Aahan, I always love reading your thoughts although must admit skipping to the summary which is most helpful if I'm short on time. One thing that always strikes me is a little bit of confusion regarding strategy's (I know you've introduced new ones) and there expected risk/return.
For example the ETF portfolio summary usually states:
"We aim to achieve strong risk-adjusted returns relative to cash, with limited capital drawdowns in depth and duration"
Which is in contrast to article above:
"ETF Portfolio: Beta + Alpha. Aims to outperform a balanced mix of stocks, bonds, commodities, and gold. Weekly signals."
Unless the ETF Beta + Alpha is different to the "ETF Portfolio"?
Wanted to flag it as I'm guessing others might be struggling with this as well. An explicite risk/return profile would be helpful.
Many thanks,
Phil